3 /5
2

A Review of Livewello + Comparison to SelfDecode

Written by Joe Cohen, BS | Last updated:

The following is a feature comparison between two popular online genetic analysis tools, Livewello and SelfDecode. As you will see in more detail below, Livewello and SelfDecode have different visions and purposes for their tools, so choose the one that more closely suits your personal goals.

Different Missions

One core difference between SelfDecode and Livewello is SelfDecode’s mission to become everyone’s personal digital health coach. This mission is manifested through a more comprehensive and diverse set of tools, which include a recommendation engine, and gene/chemical interaction interface.

The recommendation engine, which Livewello wholly lacks, allows users to see a list of the top recommended substances (either artificial or natural) based on these substance’s interactions with your specific genome. This list is sorted by complex algorithms that rank each substance based on their overall benefit in light of all the positive and negative interactions it may have across your bodies numerous pathways.

Livewello has been out since 2011 and gained popularity by being one of the first available tools on the internet for this type of analysis. SelfDecode, on the other hand, launched more recently in 2016 and has caught up to entrenched competitors quite quickly.

Due to Livewello’s maturity, it has gathered a sizable community of people that discuss and post in their forum. Although Livewello boasts having data on more than 48,000 SNPs, the content is often not summarized in a reader way and the relevant references can be elusive at times.

screenshot-2017-01-25-00-28-32

Another key feature of SelfDecode, and that Livewello lacks, is the ability to share your account’s data with another user. This feature allows your physician or health consultant to browse all of your account data as if they were you, with no necessity to print out a report or give them your login credentials. This has been a critical tool in helping Joseph Cohen’s health coaching clients efficiently share their data with him and other consultants remotely.

screenshot-2017-01-25-00-31-26

Feature Comparison

FeatureLivewelloSelfDecode
Curated Content5/109/10
Easy To Use5/108/10
ForumYesYes
Custom ReportsYesYes
PDF ExportYesYes
Recommendations4/108/10
Holistic Approach3/108/10

Holistic Approach

While Livewello focuses on the implications of the user’s genetic polymorphisms, SelfDecode has taken it a step further by also integrating several other sources of scientific data that glean important insight into an individual’s physiology. These include a database of 20,000 genes, 40,000 SNPs, 1 million substances, 15,000 diseases, health effects, and the integration of self-administered symptom and condition surveys, all of which contribute to a holistic data source for the recommendation algorithms to more intelligently base their decisions on.

screenshot-2017-01-24-23-40-10

Conclusion

With the above being said, Livewello and SelfDecode are comparable products with many features in common, such as a forum, PDF export, GWAS SNP search, and allele-specific reports. The key differences lie in the quality of recommendations and the granularity of the user data. SelfDecode believes that as more devices passively generate physiological data from users, these sources must be used in an integrated way to create a comprehensive picture of a persons health and base recommendations on the most granular data available, while Livewello appears to focus less on a holistic approach and mainly on genetics. Depending on your personal health goals, I urge you to decide on whichever tool you believe best suits your specific needs.

About the Author

Joe Cohen, BS

Joe Cohen, BS

Joe Cohen won the genetic lottery of bad genes. As a kid, he suffered from inflammation, brain fog, fatigue, digestive problems, anxiety, depression, and other issues that were poorly understood in both conventional and alternative medicine.Frustrated by the lack of good information and tools, Joe decided to embark on a journey of self-experimentation and self-learning to improve his health--something that has since become known as “biohacking”. With thousands of experiments and pubmed articles under his belt, Joe founded SelfHacked, the resource that was missing when he needed it. SelfHacked now gets millions of monthly readers.Joe is a thriving entrepreneur, author and speaker. He is the CEO of SelfHacked, SelfDecode and LabTestAnalyzer.His mission is to help people gain access to the most up-to-date, unbiased, and science-based ways to optimize their health.
Joe has been studying health sciences for 17 years and has read over 30,000 PubMed articles. He's given consultations to over 1000 people who have sought his health advice. After completing the pre-med requirements at university, he founded SelfHacked because he wanted to make a big impact in improving global health. He's written hundreds of science posts, multiple books on improving health, and speaks at various health conferences. He's keen on building a brain-trust of top scientists who will improve the level of accuracy of health content on the web. He's also founded SelfDecode and LabTestAnalyzer, popular genetic and lab software tools to improve health.

Click here to subscribe

RATE THIS ARTICLE

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
(23 votes, average: 3.04 out of 5)
Loading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.